Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42758738›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Determining essential priorities for future investigation - A national consensus exercise in Interventional Oncology (DEFINE-IO) - An a priori protocol.

Vinson Wai-Shun Chan, Blair Graham, Helen Hoi-Lam Ng, Scott Griffiths, Deevia Kotecha, Hanif Ismail, Paul Jenkins, Jim Zhong, Raghuram Lakshminarayan, Tze Min Wah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vinson Wai-Shun ChanUK National Interventional Radiology Research Collaborative, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6108-9315
Blair GrahamDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.
Helen Hoi-Lam NgUK National Interventional Radiology Research Collaborative, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7465-2090
Scott GriffithsUK National Interventional Radiology Research Collaborative, United Kingdom.
Deevia KotechaUK National Interventional Radiology Research Collaborative, United Kingdom.
Hanif IsmailResearch and Innovation Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Paul JenkinsDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4490-316X
Jim ZhongUK National Interventional Radiology Research Collaborative, United Kingdom.
Raghuram LakshminarayanDepartment of Vascular Radiology, Hull Teaching University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom.
Tze Min WahDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInterventional Oncology (IO) is a rapidly developing subspecialty within interventional radiology (IR), offering minimally invasive, precise and targeted cancer therapies. Despite its transformative potential, IO faces challenges in identifying critical research priorities amidst limited funding and resources. The DEFINE-IO study aims to identify the most pressing research priorities in IO to guide researchers, policy makers, and funding bodies in driving innovation and improving cancer outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study comprises two phases: a modified e-Delphi process and a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The e-Delphi process will involve three rounds, with round 1 dedicated to generating research topics, followed by rounds 2 and 3, which will focus on refining and achieving consensus on the identified topics. The final consensus will yield a list of 25 research priorities, which will be evaluated during an in-person MCDA session. These priorities will be assessed against three predefined criteria: urgency, feasibility/equipoise, and affordability, to establish a strategic roadmap for research in IO. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethics approval was deemed not necessary. Findings of the study will be presented at major conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. The findings will also be shared with funding bodies and policymakers to help guide future research directions.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyNeoplasmsRadiology, InterventionalConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumans

Identifiers

PMID42758738
PMCPMC13588361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.