Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42758733›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

An adapted enhanced social prescribing intervention vs. usual care in the treatment of loneliness in cancer survivors: Study protocol for a feasibility pilot randomized controlled trial.

Brooke Ike, Allison Cole, Brennan Keiser, Alison Tu, Madison Holcroft, Sebastian Tong

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07418437 (Adapting and Pilot Testing a Loneliness Intervention for Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07418437 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Adapting and Pilot Testing a Loneliness Intervention for Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2026 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsCancer Survivorship, LonelinessArmsSocial Prescribing Group, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brooke IkeDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Allison ColeDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4393-464X
Brennan KeiserDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7697-0962
Alison TuDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Madison HolcroftDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0797-235X
Sebastian TongDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLoneliness has increased substantially in the past decade and adversely affects the health and wellbeing of cancer survivors. Cancer diagnosis and treatment can lead to profound negative changes in health status and social support. In addition to prevention and detection of recurrence and new cancers, survivorship care also requires attention to managing financial, psychological, and physical wellbeing after cancer treatment. Multiple efficacious interventions exist for loneliness, including Social Prescribing, a UK-based model that supports individuals in improving their social connections. However, none have been adapted to meet the needs and preferences of cancer survivors.

designThis feasibility study protocol is reported according to the SPIRIT 2013 and 2025 statements. We adapted an efficacious Social Prescribing intervention to target loneliness in adult cancer survivors, using the ADAPT-ITT process. This protocol describes plans to conduct a feasibility study in preparation for a randomized controlled trial of the Enhanced Social Prescribing intervention. Participants will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to usual care (brochure) or Enhanced Social Prescribing (intervention). We will recruit 36 participants from two rural and rural-serving primary care practices in the Northwest U.S.. Eligible individuals are age 18 or older, screen positive for loneliness on the 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale, received a diagnosis of cancer in the past seven years, and speak English. The Enhanced Social Prescribing intervention meets one hour weekly for nine weeks. The primary outcome is participant-reported loneliness as measured by the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Secondary outcomes include participant reported social connection, self-efficacy, quality of life. Self-reported receipt of guideline concordant cancer survivorship care is an exploratory outcome. We will also measure Reach, Implementation, and Acceptability/Appropriateness of the Enhanced Social Support intervention. Using an intent to treat analysis, participants will be analyzed according to their assigned group. We will use linear mixed models to estimate differences between the intervention arm and control arm, and changes in outcomes over the study period. This study protocol is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT07418437). ANTICIPATED

resultsWe anticipate successful recruitment of 36 participants and delivery of the Enhanced Social Prescribing intervention to 18 participants. DISCUSSION: This study will demonstrate the feasibility of testing the Enhanced Social Prescribing intervention and provide preliminary data and procedures for a larger-scale randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness and study the implementation of Enhanced Social Prescribing.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsLonelinessNeoplasmsSocial PrescribingAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID42758733
PMCPMC13588344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.