ArticlePloS one2026
An adapted enhanced social prescribing intervention vs. usual care in the treatment of loneliness in cancer survivors: Study protocol for a feasibility pilot randomized controlled trial.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07418437 (Adapting and Pilot Testing a Loneliness Intervention for Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Adapting and Pilot Testing a Loneliness Intervention for Cancer Survivors
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLoneliness has increased substantially in the past decade and adversely affects the health and wellbeing of cancer survivors. Cancer diagnosis and treatment can lead to profound negative changes in health status and social support. In addition to prevention and detection of recurrence and new cancers, survivorship care also requires attention to managing financial, psychological, and physical wellbeing after cancer treatment. Multiple efficacious interventions exist for loneliness, including Social Prescribing, a UK-based model that supports individuals in improving their social connections. However, none have been adapted to meet the needs and preferences of cancer survivors.
designThis feasibility study protocol is reported according to the SPIRIT 2013 and 2025 statements. We adapted an efficacious Social Prescribing intervention to target loneliness in adult cancer survivors, using the ADAPT-ITT process. This protocol describes plans to conduct a feasibility study in preparation for a randomized controlled trial of the Enhanced Social Prescribing intervention. Participants will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to usual care (brochure) or Enhanced Social Prescribing (intervention). We will recruit 36 participants from two rural and rural-serving primary care practices in the Northwest U.S.. Eligible individuals are age 18 or older, screen positive for loneliness on the 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale, received a diagnosis of cancer in the past seven years, and speak English. The Enhanced Social Prescribing intervention meets one hour weekly for nine weeks. The primary outcome is participant-reported loneliness as measured by the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Secondary outcomes include participant reported social connection, self-efficacy, quality of life. Self-reported receipt of guideline concordant cancer survivorship care is an exploratory outcome. We will also measure Reach, Implementation, and Acceptability/Appropriateness of the Enhanced Social Support intervention. Using an intent to treat analysis, participants will be analyzed according to their assigned group. We will use linear mixed models to estimate differences between the intervention arm and control arm, and changes in outcomes over the study period. This study protocol is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT07418437). ANTICIPATED
resultsWe anticipate successful recruitment of 36 participants and delivery of the Enhanced Social Prescribing intervention to 18 participants. DISCUSSION: This study will demonstrate the feasibility of testing the Enhanced Social Prescribing intervention and provide preliminary data and procedures for a larger-scale randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness and study the implementation of Enhanced Social Prescribing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.