Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42758688›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Comprehensive analysis method of key risk factors in the subway operation accident by complex network and accident data.

Shengxiang Ma, Wei Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shengxiang MaChina University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0689-607X
Wei JiangChina University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the continuous expansion of subway systems in China, the operational systems of subway have become increasingly complex, leading to a rise in risk factors. In the event of an accident, these risks can significantly impact the safety and health of individuals, and pose a direct threat to the reliability, social stability, and economic sustainability of subway systems. To effectively prevent the occurrence of operational accidents and ensure the sustainable development of subway systems, it is essential to explore the key risk factors of subway accidents through appropriate technological approaches. This study proposes an integrated approach combining the 24Model, association rule mining, and complex network theory to conduct in-depth mining and analysis of textual data from accident reports, thereby identifying risk factors and exploring the coupling relationships and importance among them. First, risk factors were extracted by analyzing 76 reports using the 24Model. Then, the Apriori algorithm was applied to derive association rules among the risk factors, based on which a risk factor network model was constructed. Finally, the robustness analysis and mutual information theory were employed to validate the model and identify the key risk factors. The results show that unclear safety responsibilities of employees, safety responsibility of managers, insufficient safety oversight of subcontractors, and lack of targeted content in safety training are the four most critical risk factors. The findings of this study provide important safety management decision-making support for the development of more sustainable subway operational systems.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficRailroadsAlgorithmsChinaData MiningHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID42758688
PMCPMC13588349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.