ArticlePloS one2026
Development of an implementation strategy for a workplace smoking cessation program with financial incentives using Implementation Mapping.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWorkplace group training programs for smoking cessation that incorporate financial incentives are cost-effective but face implementation challenges. This study aimed to systematically develop an evidence-informed implementation strategy for such programs in Dutch companies.
methodsFrom January 2019 to September 2021, we used Implementation Mapping, guided by the RE-AIM Framework, to design the strategy. A planning team comprising researchers, employers, employees, and smoking cessation counselors followed five structured steps: conducting a needs assessment; identifying adopters and implementers; setting implementation and maintenance outcomes; developing matrices of change objectives; producing protocols and materials; and creating an evaluation plan.
resultsThe needs assessment highlighted essential actions to enhance program implementation. Company directors and HR managers were identified as key adopters and implementers. Performance objectives included deciding to offer group training, applying financial incentives, proactively recruiting smoking employees, and organizing the intervention at least twice. Determinants influencing these objectives were attitude, outcome expectations, skills, self-efficacy, knowledge, normative beliefs, and perceived barriers. Evidence-based strategies were selected to address these determinants, and several supportive materials were developed: an implementation guide, informational website with downloadable resources, an animated promotional video, three testimonial videos, and a live webinar with recording to train employers in recruitment. The strategy was evaluated and refined based on stakeholder feedback.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates how a systematic, theory-based approach can support the development of tailored implementation strategies for workplace smoking cessation programs with financial incentives. Engaging key stakeholders and addressing context-specific barriers and facilitators may strengthens the potential for real-world adoption and long-term sustainability. This approach can inform future implementation efforts for evidence-based tobacco control interventions in occupational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.