ArticleeLife2026
Linear antibody epitope prediction using AlphaFold2.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking AlphaFold and related deep learning approaches for modeling antibody and TCR antigen recognition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- AI-assisted protein design to rapidly convert antibody sequences to intrabodies targeting diverse peptides and histone modifications.Science advances · 2026Article
- Evaluation of AlphaFold modeling for elucidation of nanobody-peptide epitope interactions.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Alphafold modeling for elucidation of nanobody-peptide epitope interactions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- AI-assisted protein design to rapidly convert antibody sequences to intrabodies targeting diverse peptides and histone modifications.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Defining the binding epitopes of antibodies is essential for understanding how they bind to their antigens and perform their molecular functions. However, while determining linear epitopes of monoclonal antibodies can be accomplished utilizing well-established empirical procedures, these approaches are generally labor- and time-intensive, and costly. To take advantage of the recent advances in protein structure prediction algorithms available to the scientific community, we developed a calculation pipeline based on the localColabFold implementation of AlphaFold2 that can predict linear antibody epitopes by predicting the structure of the complex between antibody heavy and light chains and target peptide sequences derived from antigens. We found that this AlphaFold2 pipeline, which we call PAbFold, was able to accurately flag known epitope sequences for several well-known antibody targets (HA/Myc) when the target sequence was broken into small overlapping linear peptides and antibody complementarity determining regions were grafted onto several different antibody framework regions in the single-chain antibody fragment format. To determine if this pipeline was able to identify the epitope of a novel antibody with no structural information publicly available, we determined the epitope of a novel anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid-targeted antibody using our method and then experimentally validated our computational results using peptide competition ELISA assays. These results indicate that the AlphaFold2-based PAbFold pipeline we developed is capable of accurately identifying linear antibody epitopes in a short time using just antibody and target protein sequences. This emergent capability of the method is sensitive to methodological details such as peptide length, AlphaFold2 neural network versions, and multiple-sequence alignment databases. PAbFold is available at https://github.com/jbderoo/PAbFold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.