ArticleJAMA network open2026
Medicaid Expansion and Mortality Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) substantially increased insurance coverage among adults with low income, yet its impact on colorectal cancer survival and underlying mechanisms remains incompletely defined. Objective: To evaluate the association between Medicaid expansion and overall survival among adults with colorectal cancer and to assess heterogeneity by race and ethnicity, disease stage, and potential mechanisms, including stage at diagnosis and treatment use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database (2006-2021). Adults aged 40 to 64 years with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer were included. A difference-in-differences design compared outcomes between Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states in pre-ACA (2006-2013) and post-ACA (2014-2021) periods. The data were analyzed between January 18 and March 30, 2026. Exposure: Residence in a Medicaid expansion vs nonexpansion state. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included stage at diagnosis and treatment use. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs), relative hazard reductions, and absolute differences were estimated. Results: Among 658 593 adults (mean [SD] age, 54.9 [6.3] years; 366 800 male [55.7%]), Medicaid expansion was associated with lower overall mortality (difference-in-differences HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93-0.95]), corresponding to a 6.3% (95% CI, 5.1%-7.5%) relative reduction in overall mortality. The largest survival association was observed among Hispanic patients (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75-0.80]). Benefits were also seen across all disease stages, with the most pronounced association observed in stage IV disease (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.83-0.94]). Expansion was associated with an increase of 2.13 percentage points in early-stage diagnosis (95% CI, 1.60-2.65 percentage points) and increased surgical treatment (1.54 percentage points [95% CI, 1.19-1.90 percentage points]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of adults with colorectal cancer found that Medicaid expansion was associated with improved survival. Observed shifts in stage at diagnosis and treatment use were consistent with but could not establish, given the available data, earlier detection and improved access to definitive care as mechanisms. Persistent heterogeneity across populations highlights the need for additional strategies to ensure equitable cancer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.