ArticleAIDS (London, England)2026
Retention in care: is it still a clinically useful indicator for monitoring long-term engagement in HIV care in the treat-all era?
Article in AIDS (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDescribe changes in visit frequency by viral suppression (VS) vs. non-VS among people with HIV (PWH) in the US treat-all era.
designObservational cohort study.
methodsWe defined six period-cohorts of PWH in U.S. clinical cohorts of the NA-ACCORD who had initiated antiretroviral therapy and were retained in clinic (attended ≥1 visit in 9 months [mo]) prior to January 1, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 (n = 42 389-54 655). We estimated the proportions of PWH retained in clinic, having gaps in visits of >9-15mo or >15mo, and returned to clinic after gaps by time-updated VS status (< vs. ≥200 copies/ml) over 2 years of follow-up using multi-state models, standardized to the 2012 cohort.
resultsPWH in 2012 cohort had a median age of 51 years (IQR: 43-58); 85% were cismen; 43% were non-Hispanic Black; 15% were Hispanic; 84% had VS at baseline. The proportions of PWH having >9-15mo gaps with prior VS increased from 2012 (3.8%; 95% CI: 3.6%, 3.9%) to 2022 (6.9%; 95% CI: 6.5%, 7.3%). The proportions of PWH having >15mo gaps with prior VS increased from 2012 (6.6%; 95% CI: 6.4%, 6.8%) to 2022 (10.7%; 95% CI: 10.2%, 11.2%). The proportions of PWH with >9-15mo and >15mo gaps with non-VS remained low from 2012 to 2022. The majority of PWH returned to clinic after gaps.
conclusionsOver the past 12 years, PWH with prior VS had more gaps in visits that did not meet a minimum of 6-mo visit frequency consistent with standard retention indicators. Better indicators are needed to optimally direct resources for care engagement and VS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.