Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42758476›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthodontics2026

Artificial intelligence for facial attractiveness assessment in orthodontics: model development and evaluation.

Platon-Timotheos Perdikaris, Miltiadis A Makrygiannakis, Apostolos Ntokos, Eleftherios G Kaklamanos

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Platon-Timotheos PerdikarisSchool of Dentistry, European University Cyprus, 6 Diogenous str., Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.
Miltiadis A MakrygiannakisSchool of Dentistry, European University Cyprus, 6 Diogenous str., Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0003-2855-8623
Apostolos NtokosIndependent Scholar, Athens 13123, Greece.
Eleftherios G KaklamanosSchool of Dentistry, European University Cyprus, 6 Diogenous str., Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-0513-5110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAchieving valid and reproducible facial attractiveness assessment in orthodontic practice remains challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential in orthodontics and may help reduce inconsistencies in the evaluation of facial and smile aesthetics. This study aimed to develop and internally validate an AI model for assessing facial attractiveness in a Caucasian population. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study sample was derived from a subset of the SCUT-FBP5500 V2 dataset and included Caucasian subjects, comprising 750 males and 750 females with human-rated facial attractiveness scores on a 1-5 scale. The model was based on a ResNet-50 backbone pretrained on ImageNet. Training was performed using the Adam optimizer (learning rate 0.0001) and mean squared error loss for up to 100 epochs. Stratified data splits of 70% for training, 10% for validation, and 20% for testing were created according to facial attractiveness score and sex. During training, data augmentation techniques, including resizing, random horizontal flipping, rotation, colour jittering, and tensor conversion, was applied, whereas the validation and test sets underwent resizing only. All experiments were conducted on a Linux-based system with an NVIDIA RTX 2080 GPU, using Python 3.12 and PyTorch v2.9. Model performance was assessed using MAE and RMSE across the test set, by sex, and across facial attractiveness-score quintiles.

resultsThe model demonstrated predictive performance on the test set, with an MAE of 0.215 (95% CI: 0.196-0.234) and an RMSE of 0.276 (95% CI: 0.251-0.300). Sex-specific analysis showed marginally better performance in males, with an MAE of 0.201 (95% CI: 0.177-0.225), compared with 0.228 (95% CI: 0.198-0.264) in females (P = 0.662). The highest accuracy was observed in the densely represented segment of the dataset, where the MAE was 0.156 (95% CI: 0.119-0.199). Error metrics varied across attractiveness-score ranges and were highest in the (3.02-3.63] range.

conclusionsThe proposed model closely approximated human ratings of facial attractiveness and demonstrated predictive accuracy. These findings support the potential of AI-based tools to provide more consistent aesthetic assessments in orthodontics. Future research should include diverse populations to improve generalizability and clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBeautyEsthetics, DentalFaceOrthodonticsAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSex FactorsWhite Peopleartificial intelligencedeep learningfacial attractivenessorthodonticsResNet-50SCUT-FBP5500

Identifiers

PMID42758476
PMCPMC13587823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.