Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42758465›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Event segmentation and encoding rely on information accumulated over different temporal scales.

Karen Sasmita, Khena M Swallow

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karen SasmitaDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, 211 Uris Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA. ksasmita@nus.edu.sg.
Khena M SwallowDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, 211 Uris Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People spontaneously divide experience into discrete units (event segmentation) that shape episodic memory. Although it is generally assumed that both event segmentation and episodic memory reflect the generation and maintenance of event models (mental representations of the ongoing situation), the degree to which these two aspects of cognition reflect the same processes is unclear. We examined this question by disrupting the ability to accumulate coherent information over time and evaluating the effect on both processes. We asked participants to segment and afterwards recall video excerpts that were presented uninterrupted, interrupted by a white-noise display every minute, or interrupted and jumbled by playing the 1-min-long video clips out of order. Interrupting or jumbling videos did not significantly change overall segmentation rates, patterns, or the tendency to hierarchically organize events. However, a finer-grained temporal analysis indicated that the segmentation rate briefly increased following a jumbled clip, stabilizing after 5 s. These findings suggest that content-based event segmentation stabilizes quickly following jumps in the narrative. In contrast, jumbling the videos every minute significantly reduced the number of events recalled and their organization with respect to time and semantics. Thus, event segmentation and memory encoding are differently impacted by disruptions in an ongoing narrative. Whereas event segmentation appears to rely on information accumulated over a relatively short timescale, episodic memory depends on the ability to integrate information over longer time periods.

Indexed as

Event memoryEvent segmentationNarrative comprehensionNaturalistic perceptionTemporal accumulation

Identifiers

PMID42758465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.