ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Event segmentation and encoding rely on information accumulated over different temporal scales.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People spontaneously divide experience into discrete units (event segmentation) that shape episodic memory. Although it is generally assumed that both event segmentation and episodic memory reflect the generation and maintenance of event models (mental representations of the ongoing situation), the degree to which these two aspects of cognition reflect the same processes is unclear. We examined this question by disrupting the ability to accumulate coherent information over time and evaluating the effect on both processes. We asked participants to segment and afterwards recall video excerpts that were presented uninterrupted, interrupted by a white-noise display every minute, or interrupted and jumbled by playing the 1-min-long video clips out of order. Interrupting or jumbling videos did not significantly change overall segmentation rates, patterns, or the tendency to hierarchically organize events. However, a finer-grained temporal analysis indicated that the segmentation rate briefly increased following a jumbled clip, stabilizing after 5 s. These findings suggest that content-based event segmentation stabilizes quickly following jumps in the narrative. In contrast, jumbling the videos every minute significantly reduced the number of events recalled and their organization with respect to time and semantics. Thus, event segmentation and memory encoding are differently impacted by disruptions in an ongoing narrative. Whereas event segmentation appears to rely on information accumulated over a relatively short timescale, episodic memory depends on the ability to integrate information over longer time periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42758465What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.