ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Dynamic nutritional changes between relapse and second allogeneic transplantation predict survival in acute leukemia.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relapse after a first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT1) remains a major therapeutic challenge in acute leukemia, and second transplantation (HSCT2) is frequently considered for selected patients. Although pre-transplant nutritional status has been associated with outcomes after HSCT2, the prognostic significance of changes in nutritional status between relapse and HSCT2 remains unclear. This multicenter retrospective study analyzed 67 patients with acute myeloid leukemia or acute lymphoblastic leukemia who underwent HSCT2 after relapse following HSCT1. Nutritional status was evaluated using serum albumin, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), and body mass index (BMI) at relapse and before HSCT2. In multivariate analysis, declines in serum albumin and GNRI during this interval were independently associated with inferior overall survival, whereas BMI decline was not significant. Declines in albumin and GNRI were significantly associated with impaired performance status, but not associated with disease status at HSCT2 or treatment intensity after relapse. A composite model integrating nutritional decline and disease status at HSCT2 stratified patients into distinct prognostic groups. These findings suggest that declines in nutrition-associated indices during the relapse-to-HSCT2 interval may reflect impaired physiological reserve and provide additional prognostic information beyond disease status at transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42758460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.