ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Disentangling Between- and Within-Person Effects of HIV PrEP and Treatment Attitudes on Condom Use and Bacterial STIs Among Sexual Minority Men.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV treatment attitudes and HIV PrEP are associated with sexual behavior that elevates the risk for bacterial STIs (B-STIs) among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM). Using a longitudinal multi-site study (Engage Cohort Study, 2017-2024), we modelled direct and indirect within- and between-person effects of HIV treatment attitudes and PrEP use on condomless anal sex (CAS) and incident B-STIs among 1863 HIV-negative GBM. We modelled up to four years of follow-up visits using multi-level mediation analysis, with CAS as a mediating variable between HIV treatment attitudes and PrEP use on incident B-STIs. We found direct within-person effects of HIV treatment attitudes and PrEP use on incident B-STIs, such that participants were more likely to report incident B-STIs at time points if they reported using PrEP and being more optimistic about HIV treatments; there were no indirect within-person effects through CAS. In contrast, we found both direct and indirect between-person effects. Specifically, participants who reported more PrEP use or who were more optimistic about HIV treatments over the course of the study were more likely to report incident B-STIs. Further, these effects were partially mediated by CAS. Given that we found within-person PrEP use is associated with increased CAS and STIs, and the general increase in adoption of PrEP over time, there is a need to expand biomedical intervention programs for B-STIs prophylaxis by integrating them with social and informational interventions about B-STIs risks, especially for GBM who use HIV PrEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42758449What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.