ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2026
Purification, Characterization, and In Vitro Safety Assessment of the Antimicrobial Peptide SAM-KB40 from Bacillus licheniformis SAM-D318.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are a diverse class of bioactive molecules that exert their effects through multiple mechanisms, including membrane disruption, inhibition of cell wall synthesis, interference with intracellular targets, and binding to nucleic acids or proteins. They exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and a low propensity to induce drug resistance, positioning them as promising candidates for combating multidrug-resistant infections. However, their clinical translation faces significant challenges, including protease susceptibility, potential cytotoxicity, high production costs, and suboptimal pharmacokinetic properties. In this study, a strain of Bacillus licheniformis SAM-D318 isolated from Hu sheep intestine was used as the peptide-producing strain; genomic analysis confirmed the absence of classical virulence toxin genes despite intrinsic multidrug resistance. A previously unreported cationic α-helical antimicrobial peptide, SAM-KB40 (4176.92 Da, pI 10.886), was obtained from the fermentation supernatant of B. licheniformis SAM-D318 and purified using cation-exchange chromatography and C18 reversed-phase chromatography, achieving a 70.45-fold increase in specific activity. Structural prediction by PEP-FOLD4 suggested an α-helical propensity in the C-terminal region, while circular dichroism spectroscopy indicated that SAM-KB40 adopts a predominantly random coil conformation in aqueous solution. The peptide exhibited potent antibacterial activity against Clostridium perfringens (MIC = 0.5 µg/mL, MBC = 4 µg/mL) and showed selective inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes. SAM-KB40 demonstrated exceptional thermal stability (> 97% activity retained at 100 °C for 60 min), good tolerance to acidic conditions (pH 3-4) and bile salts (up to 0.50%), and remarkably low hemolytic activity (1.96% at 1000 µg/mL). Notably, the peptide neutralized recombinant C. perfringens α-toxin at 16 µg/mL in a Vero cell-based assay and exhibited no cytotoxicity at concentrations up to 128 µg/mL, demonstrating a favorable in vitro safety profile.Sequence homology analysis against UniProt, NCBI, APD, and BACTIBASE databases confirmed that SAM-KB40 has not been previously reported. While the peptide shows promising in vitro dual antibacterial and toxin-neutralizing capacity, its high sensitivity to proteinase K (39.78% residual activity) limits oral application. These findings position SAM-KB40 as a promising lead candidate for further development as a feed additive or therapeutic agent against C. perfringens-associated diseases, pending subsequent in vivo validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42758393What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.