ReviewCurrent urology reports2026
Hydrogel-Based Therapies for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: From Bulking Agents to Regenerative Platforms-A Narrative Review.
Review in Current urology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review summarizes the procedural techniques, short- and long-term efficacy, and clinical application of polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAHG, Bulkamid®) as a urethral bulking agent for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI); compares PAHG with mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery; and examines emerging hydrogel-based regenerative platforms, used for mechanical bulking, delivery of bioactive molecules or cells, and extracellular matrix-mimetic scaffolding, together with their prospects for clinical translation. RECENT
findingsPAHG injection has gained acceptance as a minimally invasive option for patients who have failed conservative management, declined or are intolerant of MUS surgery, or have recurrent SUI. Follow-up studies up to 7-9 years show sustained response rates of 44%-65% with mostly transient complications and improvements in quality of life and sexual function. Randomized trials indicate that although MUS achieves superior cure rates, PAHG is associated with fewer severe complications, aligning with patient preferences for less invasive procedures. In preclinical animal models, injectable hydrogels loaded with bioactive molecules or cells provide mechanical bulking and simultaneously promote tissue regeneration, including angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and modulation of the inflammatory response. PAHG is a well-tolerated, minimally invasive bulking agent that achieves sustained symptomatic relief and meaningful quality-of-life improvements. Dual-function hydrogel systems combining bulking and sustained regenerative repair may represent a future direction for SUI therapy; however, most evidence remains preclinical, and further material optimization, rigorous safety evaluation, and well-designed clinical trials are needed before clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42758376What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.