SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Metabolic modulation of glioblastoma by dietary intervention: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically evaluate and critically synthesize preclinical and clinical evidence on the efficacy, safety, mechanistic rationale, and interpretive limitations of ketogenic diet (KD) and methionine restriction (MR) in glioma treatment.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed and Embase from inception through August 19, 2026, for in vivo preclinical and clinical studies evaluating KD or MR in glioma Clinical studies were eligible with or without a non-diet comparator because most available studies were early-phase, single-arm feasibility investigations. We extracted intervention, comparator, concurrent oncologic treatment, metabolic, safety, feasibility, and outcome data; assessed risk of bias using design-appropriate tools; and conducted narrative and structured direction-of-effect syntheses.
resultsA total of 43 eligible reports were included: 14 preclinical and 18 clinical KD reports and 9 preclinical and 2 clinical studies of MR. Preclinical effects were heterogeneous: several diet-only experiments reduced growth or prolonged survival, whereas others showed limited activity; selected combinations with radiation, antiangiogenic therapy, glutamine targeting, or immune modulation produced greater effects. Clinical evidence primarily supported feasibility and metabolic activity, not independent efficacy, because most studies were small, uncontrolled, and confounded by concurrent or prior treatment. MR showed preclinical activity, but clinical evidence remained limited to two small chemotherapy-combination trials.
conclusionKD and MR have biologic rationale and can alter systemic or intratumoral metabolism, but current clinical data do not establish an independent survival benefit. Their effects cannot be separated reliably from surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, bevacizumab, corticosteroids, and other co-interventions in most studies. Randomized trials with intention-to-treat analysis, standardized glucose-ketone index reporting, treatment and corticosteroid documentation, and longitudinal nutritional assessment are required before these diets can be recommended as effective glioma therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42758370What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.