Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42758345›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2026

Training imaging professionals on transgender-inclusive breast cancer screening practices.

Arielle Martinez, Sarah Whitton, Jonah Yokoyama, Jules Madzia, Carson S Hartlage, Elizabeth Kelly, Madeline Schumacher, Delia Sosa, Harsimran Makkad, Catherine Xu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Arielle MartinezUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.
Sarah WhittonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cincinnati College of Arts & Sciences , Cincinnati, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6566-1219
Jonah YokoyamaEquitas Health, Columbus, USA.
Jules MadziaUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9636-0163
Carson S HartlageUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7875-8215
Elizabeth KellyUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.
Madeline SchumacherUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1686-5298
Delia SosaUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.
Harsimran MakkadUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-3703
Catherine XuUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.
Rahul PatelUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.
Sarah PickleDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1099-796X
Shanna StrykerEquitas Health, Columbus, USA. strykesa@ucmail.uc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9983-1346

Funding

University of Cincinnati 2023 Integrating Special Populations Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTransgender/gender diverse (TGD) people are underscreened for breast cancer. A barrier to screening is anticipated discrimination during screening encounters. This pilot study evaluates a training session for breast imaging professionals (clinical support specialists, technologists, and radiologists) on LGBTQIA+-inclusive breast cancer screening visits.

methodsTraining topics included terminology, an overview of the guidelines, principles of trauma-informed care, and strategies for creating a welcoming and inclusive environment. Pre- and post-surveys gathered participants' demographic information, frequency of LGBTQIA+ patient interactions, and previous exposure to LGBTQIA+ training and assessed changes in knowledge, self-reported knowledge, and attitudes toward gender diversity.

resultsIn pre-surveys, participants reported frequent interactions with LGBTQIA+ patients and little previous training. A 45-min didactic training that included storytelling of relevant experiences resulted in a significant increase in participants' self-reported knowledge of LGBTQIA+ terminology with a large effect size. After training, participants correctly answered more directly assessed knowledge questions (small effect size), with a trend toward attitudes more accepting of gender diversity (medium effect size), but neither reached statistical significance.

conclusionContinued efforts to implement and evaluate inclusive education for the entire clinical team are essential to enabling more inclusive and welcoming clinical encounters that will reduce the disparities in breast cancer screening for TGD populations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealth PersonnelTransgender PersonsAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancer screeningEducationMammographyTransgender

Identifiers

PMID42758345
PMCPMC13588859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.