SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Dose-response relationship between exercise interventions and motor skills in children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a significant public health concern, with most ASD children suffering from motor skill impairments. This study aimed to explore the dose-response relationship between exercise interventions and motor skill outcomes in children with ASD, thereby identifying the exercise dose associated with the largest intervention effects. Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) were systematically searched from database inception to April 2026. Experimental studies evaluating the effects of exercise interventions on motor skills in children with ASD were included. The outcomes included overall motor skills, gross motor skills, and fine motor skills. Effect sizes were calculated as Hedges' g, and multilevel random-effect models were fitted using the metafor package. The multilevel meta-analysis and dose-response analysis were used to assess the dose-response relationship between exercise and motor skills. Moderation analyses were conducted to explore significant influencing covariates. A total of 34 studies from 12 countries were included, involving 1,082 children with ASD within the eligible age range of 3-12 years. Results of three-level meta-analysis showed that exercise interventions significantly improved motor skills in children with ASD (Hedges' g = 0.95, 95% CI [0.67, 1.23]), including gross motor skills (Hedges' g = 0.99, 95% CI [0.67, 1.30]) and fine motor skills (Hedges' g = 0.40, 95% CI [0.14, 0.66]). Dose-response analyses indicated an exploratory dose-response pattern, with the estimated effects reaching their highest values at approximately 46 sessions of 45 min each for overall motor skills and 44 sessions of approximately 47 min each for gross motor skills. Moderator analyses indicated that the time point of the test significantly influenced the effect of exercise on overall motor skills, with the immediate test showing a greater effect size than the delayed test (P = 0.044). No significant moderators were identified for gross motor skills or fine motor skills.
conclusionExercise significantly improved overall, gross, and fine motor skills in children with ASD. Dose-response relationships were identified for overall and gross motor skills. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Motor impairments are prevalent in children with ASD and represent an important barrier to functional independence and participation. WHAT IS NEW: • This is the first multilevel and dose-response meta-analysis evaluating exercise effects on overall, gross, and fine motor skills in children with ASD. • Dose-response analyses identified exploratory dose-response patterns for overall and gross motor skills, with estimated peak effects at approximately 46 sessions (45 min/session) and 44 sessions (47 min/session), respectively. • Assessment time point moderated effects on overall motor skills, with larger effects observed immediately after intervention than at delayed assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42758334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.