Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42758239›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2026

Outcomes and adverse events of postoperative stereotactic interventional radiotherapy/brachytherapy for brain metastases: a systematic review.

Mateusz Bilski, Federico Mastroleo, Izabela Baranowska, Katarzyna Konat-Bąska, Rupesh Kotecha, Ranjini Tolakanahalli, Paul Rogowski, Luca Tagliaferi, Bruno Fionda, Giulia Marvaso and 7 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Mateusz BilskiDepartment of Radiotherapy, Affidea Nu-Med Center of Oncological Diagnostics and Therapy, Zamość, Poland.
Federico MastroleoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Izabela BaranowskaDepartment of Medical Physics, St. John of Dukla Center of Oncology of the Lublin Region, Lublin, Poland.
Katarzyna Konat-BąskaDepartment of Brachytherapy, Lower Silesian Oncology Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Wrocław, Poland.
Rupesh KotechaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, USA.
Ranjini TolakanahalliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, USA.
Paul RogowskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Luca TagliaferiDipartimento Di Diagnostica Per Immagini E Radioterapia Oncologica, UOC Degenze Di Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Bruno FiondaDipartimento Di Diagnostica Per Immagini E Radioterapia Oncologica, UOC Degenze Di Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giulia MarvasoDivision of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Stefano DuranteDivision of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Andrea VavassoriDivision of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Barbara Alicja Jereczek-FossaDivision of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Mark R WaddleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Umberto RicardiDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Jacek FijuthDepartment of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.
Łukasz KuncmanDepartment of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland. lukasz.kuncman@umed.lodz.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3568-269X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative radiotherapy is commonly used after resection of brain metastases, but durable local control with a low rate of adverse events (AEs) remains challenging. This systematic review summarizes outcomes and AEs of postoperative stereotactic interventional radiotherapy (S-IRT; brachytherapy) for resected brain metastases. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through June 30, 2024. No review protocol was registered. Eligible studies reported postoperative S-IRT after metastasis resection. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by consensus. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and MINORS. Because of clinical and methodological heterogeneity, results were synthesized narratively, and no meta-analysis was performed. Eighteen studies (9 prospective, 8 retrospective, 1 case series) including 542 patients were eligible. Eleven studies used Cs-131, six used I-125, and one used both. Prescribed doses ranged from 60 to 80 Gy, usually at a depth of 5 mm. One-year local control ranged from 83 to 100%. Symptomatic radionecrosis occurred in 4.6% of Cs-131 and 9% of I-125 implants; leptomeningeal disease rates were 1.6% and 12.5%, respectively. Postoperative S-IRT appears promising, but most studies were non-comparative and heterogeneous, so findings should be considered hypothesis-generating.

Indexed as

Brain metastasesInterventional radiotherapyMetastases-directed therapyOligometastatic diseaseStereotactic brachytherapy

Identifiers

PMID42758239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.