ReviewLa Radiologia medica2026
Outcomes and adverse events of postoperative stereotactic interventional radiotherapy/brachytherapy for brain metastases: a systematic review.
Review in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative radiotherapy is commonly used after resection of brain metastases, but durable local control with a low rate of adverse events (AEs) remains challenging. This systematic review summarizes outcomes and AEs of postoperative stereotactic interventional radiotherapy (S-IRT; brachytherapy) for resected brain metastases. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through June 30, 2024. No review protocol was registered. Eligible studies reported postoperative S-IRT after metastasis resection. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by consensus. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and MINORS. Because of clinical and methodological heterogeneity, results were synthesized narratively, and no meta-analysis was performed. Eighteen studies (9 prospective, 8 retrospective, 1 case series) including 542 patients were eligible. Eleven studies used Cs-131, six used I-125, and one used both. Prescribed doses ranged from 60 to 80 Gy, usually at a depth of 5 mm. One-year local control ranged from 83 to 100%. Symptomatic radionecrosis occurred in 4.6% of Cs-131 and 9% of I-125 implants; leptomeningeal disease rates were 1.6% and 12.5%, respectively. Postoperative S-IRT appears promising, but most studies were non-comparative and heterogeneous, so findings should be considered hypothesis-generating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42758239What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.