ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Impact of resection bed management on postoperative outcomes after Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy : a retrospective French Nationwide Study (UroCCR 215).
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKidney cancer remains a significant public health issue, mainly treated by surgery for localized tumors. RAPN is increasingly adopted due to its nephron-sparing advantage, yet optimal management of the renal resection bed remains controversial. Various techniques including parenchymal and/or capsular sutures or sutureless approaches, with or without adjunctive hemostatic agents (HA), are used, but their comparative safety and efficacy are not well established. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from 5,250 patients who underwent first RAPN in 26 centres, extracted from national UroCCR database. Patients were categorized into eight groups based on resection bed management techniques, with the main groups being double-layer sutures (DLS) and parenchymal sutures, with or without HA. Postoperative complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Multivariate logistic regression was performed adjusting for key confounders including age, sex, BMI, ASA score, RENAL-score, and preoperative creatinine. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and comparison of HA use within suture and sutureless groups.
resultsIntraoperative complications were rare (3.9%). Postoperative complications occurred in 19.1% of patients, with 3.1% experiencing severe complications (≥ grade 3). The "Sutureless without HA" group had a significantly higher rate of perioperative transfusions in multivariate analysis (17.8% vs. 6.8%; adjusted OR 3.3), although this did not translate into increased reinterventions or perirenal hematomas. No significant differences were found between groups regarding infectious or length of stay. Vascular complications were lower in "DLS with HA". The use of HA in sutureless groups was associated with shorter operative times and reduced transfusion rates, and no difference was observed in suture groups.
conclusionIn this large, multicenter cohort, various hemostatic techniques during RAPN showed overall comparable safety profiles, except for a higher transfusion rate associated with sutureless without HA approaches, and a protective effect on vascular complications of DLS with HA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42758231What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.