ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Susceptibility of cancer patients and caregivers to online cancer misinformation: a qualitative interview study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDespite the benefits of the internet for cancer care, there is also a substantial risk of exposure to misinformation. Our paper aims to explore the susceptibility of cancer patients and caregivers to online cancer misinformation.
methodWe conducted semi-structured onsite interviews with nineteen cancer patients and six caregivers. We used descriptive-interpretive thematic analysis following an open-ended approach to investigate beliefs affecting susceptibility to online misinformation, the impact of cancer misinformation, the mitigation strategies, and the barriers and facilitators to safeguard against online misinformation. The theory of planned behaviour and the health belief model informed our data generation and analysis.
resultsSix major themes emerged from the analysis: navigation/evaluation beliefs, belief in peer experiences, impact of cancer misinformation, trustworthy healthcare communication, and barriers and facilitators to safeguard against online misinformation. Participants reported using superficial methods to search and evaluate online cancer information to reduce their cognitive efforts. Peer experiences were considered a trustworthy source of cancer information. Cancer misinformation impacted the psychological and physical health outcomes of patients. The participants used trustworthy healthcare communication strategies and/or information sources to mitigate the effect of online misinformation. However, fear of confronting the physicians and reluctance to interfere with the consultation process were the main identified barriers. The participants recommended providing guidance on searching and evaluating credible information to help safeguard against online misinformation.
conclusionDirecting patients to well-known online national and international cancer information repositories and introducing evaluation checklists by clinicians may help patients safely search and evaluate online information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.