ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Update on anal dysplasia and anal cancer].
Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anal dysplasia and anal cancers are predominantly caused by high-risk types of the human papillomavirus. Lesions are mostly asymptomatic and disproportionately affect high-risk populations such as people living with HIV, women with a history of vulvar (pre)cancer, and long-term immunosuppressed individuals. For these risk groups, the incidence of anal cancer is up to 100 times higher, which is why screening is recommended in the S2k guideline completed in 2024. However, it should be noted that two-thirds of anal cancers occur in older women without HIV, for whom scalable screening strategies do not yet exist due to a lack of feasible triaging methods. The ANCHOR study provided crucial evidence that timely diagnosis and treatment of high-grade anal dysplasia can significantly reduce the risk of anal cancer. To diagnose anal dysplasia, the German-Austrian guidelines recommend a two-stage process: after initial triaging using medical history, cytology, and HPV typing, high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) with biopsy represents the gold standard for diagnosis. Therapeutically, destructive methods (such as electrocautery or trichloroacetic acid) and local immunomodulatory therapies (imiquimod) are used. Cure rates after a single treatment session are relatively low at 10-30%; multiple treatment cycles are often necessary to clear high-grade anal dysplasia. Combining different therapeutic modalities is frequently a feasible strategy. For advanced anal cancer, recent studies such as POD1UM-303/InterAACT‑2 (immunotherapy with retifanlimab), as well as procedures like plasma HPV-ctDNA measurement (liquid biopsy) and dose-escalated/sparing radiation therapy, show promising results and give a perspective for the ongoing revision of the S3 guideline on anal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42758211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.