Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42758184›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026

Development of a peer support program for persons with mental health conditions in India: a formative qualitative study with expert validation of program components.

Venkatesh Kundurthi, Shanivaram K Reddy, Aarti Jagannathan, Nirmala Berigai Parthasarathy, Ponnuchamy L, Somashekhar Bijjal, Sadananda Reddy Annapally

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Venkatesh KundurthiDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Karnataka, India. venkateshmsw9@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2659-5757
Shanivaram K ReddyDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4023-6969
Aarti JagannathanDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2792-1075
Nirmala Berigai ParthasarathyDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Karnataka, India.
Ponnuchamy LDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0678-4072
Somashekhar BijjalGadag Institute of Medical Sciences, Gadag, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3328-042X
Sadananda Reddy AnnapallyJindal School of Psychology & Counselling O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6111-750X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving support for persons with long-term mental health challenges is a key concern in global mental health care. In recent years, peer support (PS) has been recognised as a person-centred and recovery-oriented approach for persons with mental health conditions. While most PS research originates from high-income countries, there's a notable gap in the literature and structured programs within low- and middle-income countries, including India.

aimThis study aimed to develop and validate a culturally adapted PS program for persons with mental health conditions tailored to the Indian context.

methodsAn exploratory qualitative design was used, following the three-phase approach: (I) a systematic literature review, (II) qualitative in-depth interviews with diverse mental health stakeholders (N = 31), and (III) development and expert validation. Interviews were conducted by KV in both face-to-face and online settings, using English, between June and December 2023. Each session lasted between 75 and 120 min and was audio-recorded with the participant's consent. A purposive sampling strategy was employed, and data collection continued until data saturation was achieved.

resultsThe finalised program, validated by experts using Lawshe's CVR (≥ 0.71), is structured around seven key themes: Core Principles of Peer Support, Structure and Process of Peer Support Groups, Content and Focus of Peer Support Interactions, Roles and Responsibilities, Guidelines for Safe and Effective Peer Support, Challenges in Peer Support Groups, and Ethical Considerations.

conclusionsThis developed peer support program (PSG) has been systematically designed to help form and facilitate peer support groups for persons with mental health conditions, and it now requires feasibility and effectiveness testing through larger experimental trials.

Indexed as

Mental Health ConditionsPeer supportPeer support program

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.