ArticleJournal of medical entomology2026
The internal larval anatomy of two rodent bot fly species: Cuterebra fontinella (Diptera: Oestridae) and Cuterebra americana.
Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species within the genus Cuterebra Clark, 1815 (Diptera: Oestridae: Cuterebrinae) are obligate parasites of rodents and other mammals during the larval stage, causing cutaneous myiasis. The internal larval anatomy of Cuterebra species remains unstudied, despite its potential utility for understanding their parasitic adaptations and for comparative studies with other Oestridae. The present study describes the internal larval anatomy of the species Cuterebra fontinella Clark, 1827 and Cuterebra americana (Fabricius, 1775), using micro-computed tomography-based virtual histological sections and 3-dimensional reconstructions. Both species show a broadly similar organization of the internal organs and tissues, with the digestive system being the main system within the hemocoel. The alimentary canal lacks gastric ceca and a crop; a condition shared with other Oestridae subfamilies, but which differs from the larvae of other Oestroidea families. The salivary glands are long and tubular, appearing morphologically distinct from those described in other Oestridae subfamilies thus far. The Malpighian tubules are uniformly thin and lack mineralized concretions, differing from the excretory organs of the oestrid species within the subfamily Oestrinae. The respiratory system shows little variation in relation to the basic tracheal scheme observed in the larvae of other cyclorrhaphous Diptera. Similarities and differences with the larvae of other Oestridae subfamilies and other Oestroidea families are discussed from a functional perspective, highlighting the value of nondestructive imaging techniques in comparative anatomical studies for contributing to a better understanding of the biology, evolution, and pathology of myiasis‑causing Diptera.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.