Trial reportEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
To Ask or Not to Ask: Does Inquiring About Participants' Expectations Influence the Placebo Effect? A Placebo Mechanism Study in Healthy Volunteers.
Trial report in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExpectations are considered a key mechanism in placebo effects, yet the impact of assessing expectations on placebo responding remains unknown. This placebo mechanism study examined whether assessing participants' expectations influenced placebo effect magnitude.
methodsSixty-four healthy participants were exposed to individually calibrated heat pain during conditioning with verbal suggestions and during two test conditions: application of an inert cream described as analgesic (placebo) and no cream (no-treatment). Participants were randomised to rate expected pain before stimulation (Group 1: expectations assessed) or not (Group 2: expectations not assessed). All participants rated perceived pain during testing and completed a brief interview on expectations at study end.
resultsOverall, pain intensity and unpleasantness were significantly lower in the placebo than in the no-treatment condition (both p < 0.001, d = 0.42-0.45). Group 1 showed significant medium-sized placebo effects for both outcomes (both p < 0.001, d = 0.51-0.57), whereas Group 2 showed small effects (intensity, p = 0.052, d = 0.32; unpleasantness, p = 0.017, d = 0.35). However, no significant between-group differences were observed in placebo effect magnitude. Expectations significantly predicted placebo effects in Group 1 (p ≤ 0.010). Retrospective reports indicated predominantly positive expectations, with no or negative expectations slightly more prevalent in Group 1.
conclusionsThese findings call for further investigation of the extent to which inquiring about participants' expectations influences the magnitude of placebo effects. They also highlight the importance of bridging placebo mechanism research and clinical trial methodology to better understand how psychological factors influence trial outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study addresses an unresolved methodological question in placebo research: whether assessing participants' expectations may itself influence placebo responding. Using an experimental placebo analgesia paradigm, it shows that assessing expectations may, to some extent, influence placebo effect magnitude, although no significant differences were observed between participants assessing expectations and those not assessing expectations. Further research is needed to determine the extent of this influence, with potential methodological implications for the design and interpretation of placebo mechanism studies and clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.