ArticleBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2026
Correct vaccination practices begin with proper education: The effect of professional training on vaccine advocacy among healthcare professionals.
Article in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHealthcare professionals, particularly midwives and nurses, have played a fundamental role in global immunization efforts by acting as the primary providers responsible for vaccine administration.
objectiveThis study aims to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference in Childhood Vaccination Advocacy Scale scores before and after vaccine advocacy awareness training. MATERIALS AND
methodsData were collected using a questionnaire on demographic characteristics and knowledge regarding vaccine administration, developed by the researcher in accordance with the literature, as well as the Vaccine Advocacy Scale for Childhood Vaccines. This research was designed as a single-group, pre-test and post-test quasi-experimental study. Pre-test and post-test scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsThe study was conducted with 249 midwives and/or nurses. The mean age of the participants was 39.40 ± 7.43 years, with an average of 18.01 ± 7.99 years of profesional experience. The mean total score on the Vaccine Advocacy Scale for Childhood Vaccines was 45.19 ± 2.85 before the training and 46.95 ± 1.99 after the training. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed that the increase in post-training scores was statistically significant (p = 0.000).
conclusionThe findings indicate that participants had relatively high levels of vaccine advocacy even prior to the training. However, the statistically significant improvement in scores post-training clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of the educational intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.