Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42757748›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2026

Beyond global comparability: why universal health coverage indicators must reflect national contexts.

Eri Osawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eri Osawa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universal health coverage (UHC) is a central objective of the global health agenda, supported by internationally standardised indicators that facilitate monitoring and accountability across countries. Although standardised global UHC indicators, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), UHC service coverage index, and out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures, support international accountability and collaboration, they do not fully capture domestic healthcare complexities driven by demographic ageing, epidemiological transitions, and evolving health system challenges. These limitations are particularly evident in countries facing complex population health needs. This viewpoint argues that UHC measurements should be adapted to national contexts, considering demographic characteristics, epidemiological profiles, healthcare delivery and financing structures, and political priorities. National governments, in cooperation with international organisations, must adopt a two-tiered monitoring approach that combines global and country-specific indicators and is underpinned by scientifically rigorous data collection. Such a multilayered framework can strengthen both domestic governance and international efforts to achieve UHC.

Indexed as

Global HealthHealth Status IndicatorsUniversal Health InsuranceHumansInternational Cooperationglobal comparabilitymonitoring and evaluationnational contextnational health indicatorsUHC service coverage indexuniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID42757748
PMCPMC13587592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.