ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2026
Comparative Efficacy of Aldosterone-Related Sodium-Retention Pathway Therapies for Resistant Hypertension: A Drug-Level Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Efficacy of Aldosterone-Related Sodium-Retention Pathway Therapies for Resistant Hypertension: A Drug-Level Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs), and epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) blockade target different levels of the aldosterone-related sodium-retention pathway in resistant hypertension (RH), but the comparative efficacy of individual agents remains uncertain. We conducted a focused drug-level network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pathway-directed therapies in adults with RH. PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to July 20, 2026. The primary outcome was change in office systolic blood pressure (BP). Secondary outcomes included office diastolic BP and 24-hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP. Ten RCTs including 2865 participants were analyzed. In the primary drug-level analysis, amiloride, spironolactone, baxdrostat, eplerenone, and lorundrostat significantly reduced office systolic BP compared with placebo, with mean differences (MDs) of -14.08, -10.78, -9.09, -8.14, and -6.80 mmHg, respectively. Osilodrostat showed a statistically uncertain effect, with an MD of -2.61 mmHg. At the class level, both MRAs and ASIs showed clinically meaningful reductions in office systolic BP. Secondary outcomes were generally consistent with the primary analysis, although fewer trials contributed to these networks. Sensitivity analyses did not materially change the primary findings. These results support the aldosterone-related sodium-retention pathway as an important therapeutic target in RH. MRAs remain the established reference add-on therapy, whereas newer ASIs and amiloride may represent pathway-based alternatives for selected patients. Trial Registration: INPLASY202670099.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.