ArticlePsycho-oncology2026
Referral and Activity in Specialist Psycho-Oncology Services: A Survey of Provision in England and Scotland.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDistress is a common, clinically significant response to cancer, yet specialist psycho-oncology provision varies across the UK, and national service-level data on staffing, access and activity are lacking.
aimsTo provide an updated picture of referral, access, workforce and activity of specialist psycho-oncology services across the UK.
methodsA cross-sectional service survey distributed UK-wide via professional networks used an 18-item questionnaire capturing staffing, referrals, waiting times, activity and outcome measures for 2022/2023. Activity was expressed per specialist whole-time equivalent (WTE); reporting followed STROBE.
resultsTwenty-five psychology-led NHS psycho-oncology services participated, all in England and Scotland. All had Level 4 provision but only 40% had Level 3. Each WTE served a mean of 1530 new cancer diagnoses, saw 83 new patients and delivered 446 attended appointments (mean 7 sessions per patient). 8.4% of patients were referred for specialist support, below the ∼25% estimated to need it. Eighty-three percent of services judged their referrals to under-represent need. Mean waits were 21 days (urgent) and 3.4 months (routine); services without a dedicated senior leadership post tended to wait longer (median routine 4 vs. 3 months; urgent 30 vs. 10 days).
conclusionsSpecialist psycho-oncology services in England and Scotland are understaffed, with long waits and inequitable access, even among psychology-led services. Senior leadership may support shorter waits but must be matched by balanced staffing across Levels 3 and 4. Workforce investment, inclusive referral pathways, a cancer-specific psychological wellbeing measure, and embedding specialist support where it is absent are needed to deliver equitable care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.