Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42757553›Full record

ArticleEcology2026

Effects of biotic homogenization on community assembly and biomass production in an α × β-diversity grassland experiment.

Fons van der Plas, Justus Hennecke, Lea von Sivers, Alexandra Weigelt, Christian Wirth, Kathryn E Barry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fons van der PlasPlant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Justus HenneckeSystematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Lea von SiversSystematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Alexandra WeigeltSystematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian WirthSystematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Kathryn E BarryEcology and Biodiversity Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6893-6479

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various studies have shown that local loss of plant species within patches (i.e., α-diversity loss) hampers plant biomass production, raising concerns about the consequences of biodiversity loss. However, biodiversity loss occurs at multiple spatial scales, and species losses at large spatial scales (γ-diversity loss) can be either caused by α-diversity loss, or by the homogenization of species compositions across patches (β-diversity loss). Yet, we poorly understand the consequences of β-diversity loss for ecosystem functioning. Here, we present the findings of the first study to experimentally manipulate variation across not only α-diversity but also β-diversity. In a grassland experiment, we manipulated plant β-diversity by setting up 56 plots, each divided into four subplots with two different soil types. Across the subplots within a plot, we sowed either the same plant species combinations (low β-diversity treatment), partially overlapping species combinations (intermediate β-diversity), or nonoverlapping species combinations (high β-diversity treatment). We hypothesized that high β-diversity could increase biomass production by: (1) enabling species sorting and (2) maintaining high α-diversity over time. Four years after setting up our experiment, we found that β-diversity increased biomass production and that these positive effects could not be solely explained by having overall high γ-diversity. This was because high sown levels of β-diversity increased realized α-diversity, which in turn increased biomass production. In contrast, species sorting did not result in increased biomass production. Our results have the potential to inform restoration projects, where sowing different species at different sites could have delayed benefits for both biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, although further studies are needed to explore the benefits of β-diversity for ecosystem management.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiomassGrasslandPlantsPoaceaeSoilSoilbeta diversitybiodiversity and ecosystem functioningbiodiversity partitioningbiotic homogenizationcommunity assemblyecosystem functioninggamma diversity

Identifiers

PMID42757553
PMCPMC13586980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.