ArticleEcology2026
Effects of biotic homogenization on community assembly and biomass production in an α × β-diversity grassland experiment.
Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various studies have shown that local loss of plant species within patches (i.e., α-diversity loss) hampers plant biomass production, raising concerns about the consequences of biodiversity loss. However, biodiversity loss occurs at multiple spatial scales, and species losses at large spatial scales (γ-diversity loss) can be either caused by α-diversity loss, or by the homogenization of species compositions across patches (β-diversity loss). Yet, we poorly understand the consequences of β-diversity loss for ecosystem functioning. Here, we present the findings of the first study to experimentally manipulate variation across not only α-diversity but also β-diversity. In a grassland experiment, we manipulated plant β-diversity by setting up 56 plots, each divided into four subplots with two different soil types. Across the subplots within a plot, we sowed either the same plant species combinations (low β-diversity treatment), partially overlapping species combinations (intermediate β-diversity), or nonoverlapping species combinations (high β-diversity treatment). We hypothesized that high β-diversity could increase biomass production by: (1) enabling species sorting and (2) maintaining high α-diversity over time. Four years after setting up our experiment, we found that β-diversity increased biomass production and that these positive effects could not be solely explained by having overall high γ-diversity. This was because high sown levels of β-diversity increased realized α-diversity, which in turn increased biomass production. In contrast, species sorting did not result in increased biomass production. Our results have the potential to inform restoration projects, where sowing different species at different sites could have delayed benefits for both biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, although further studies are needed to explore the benefits of β-diversity for ecosystem management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.