Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42757426›Full record

ReviewTransboundary and emerging diseases2026

Live Attenuated Vaccines for African Swine Fever: Perspectives on Their Use and Strategic Directions.

Nguyen Van Diep, Pham Ngoc Doanh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nguyen Van DiepAVAC Vietnam Joint Stock Company, Hung Yen, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8833-1693
Pham Ngoc DoanhInstitute of Biology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam, vast.ac.vn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4995-3446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) continues to cause substantial economic and production losses in affected countries. Although biosecurity and conventional control measures remain essential, the challenges of ASF control underscore the need for safe and effective vaccines as additional tools, particularly in endemic settings. Live attenuated vaccines (LAVs) are the most advanced ASF vaccine platform, providing the most consistent protection to date and remaining the only ASF vaccines to reach commercial deployment. Field experience with licensed products has shown encouraging safety, immunogenicity, and disease-control outcomes. However, the introduction and spread of recombinant genotype I/II strains may reduce vaccine effectiveness and contribute to limited vaccine uptake. Together with the detection of vaccine-like variants of uncertain origin, these issues have generated contrasting perspectives: a precautionary view focused on risks associated with replication-competent vaccine viruses, and a benefit-risk view emphasizing the consequences of continued ASFV circulation without effective vaccination. This review contrasts these perspectives, draws lessons from other live vaccines, and frames the responsible use of ASF LAVs within a benefit-risk approach. Experience with human and veterinary LAVs shows that persistence, transmission, genetic instability, reversion to virulence, and recombination are inherent biosafety concerns of LAVs, yet such vaccines remain important when alternative platforms do not provide equivalent protection. Their use therefore requires identifying, monitoring and minimizing residual risks in relation to expected benefits. Accordingly, ASF LAVs should be avoided in ASF-free regions but may be justified in endemic settings when licensed products are used within coordinated programs integrating adequate coverage, biosecurity, surveillance, and molecular monitoring. Future vaccine development should focus on improving safety in growing pigs and breeding animals, broadening protection against emerging ASFV strains, validating DIVA tools and developing safer next-generation platforms, while continued reassessment ensures that vaccine use remains appropriate to epidemiological conditions, emerging evidence, and disease-control needs.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusViral VaccinesAnimalsSwineVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, AttenuatedViral VaccinesAfrican swine feverASF vaccinebenefit–risk balancebiosafetylive attenuated vaccinevaccination strategy

Identifiers

PMID42757426
PMCPMC13586856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.