ReviewSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
Indocyanine green angiography in uveitis.
Review in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) represents an indispensable imaging modality for the precise evaluation and management of posterior uveitis by allowing to explore the choroidal compartment. ICGA leverages near-infrared fluorescence and extensive protein binding to provide an unhindered, dynamic assessment of the choriocapillaris and choroidal stroma. This review explores the principles, standard protocols, and clinical applications of ICGA in posterior uveitis. It details ICGA's critical role in classifying and diagnosing primary inflammatory choriocapillaropathies, like multiple evanescent white dot syndrome or serpiginous-like choroiditis, and stromal choroiditis, including Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease, birdshot chorioretinitis, and sarcoidosis. Furthermore, its utility in infectious uveitis, such as presumed intraocular tuberculosis and syphilitic chorioretinitis, is discussed. ICGA uniquely reveals subclinical choroidal lesions, such as hypofluorescent dark dots and geographic nonperfusion, which frequently exceed clinical or fluorescein angiography findings. By mapping the true extent of choroidal inflammatory activity, ICGA decisively guides the initiation and escalation or safe tapering of systemic corticosteroid and immunosuppressive therapies. Despite emerging noninvasive alternatives, ICGA cannot be fully replaced; it must be integrated into a multimodal imaging approach to optimize long-term visual outcomes and prevent irreversible structural damage in patients with complex chorioretinal inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.