ArticleCanadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique2026
A real-world analysis of adverse events and operational impacts of using T-cell engager therapy in an oncology setting.
Article in Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: T-cell engager (TCE) therapies are an emerging immunotherapy option for hematologic malignancies and small-cell lung cancer. While effective, they are associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), particularly during ramp-up dosing. Evidence to guide nursing assessment, monitoring, and operational planning in real-world settings remains limited. Purpose: To describe the frequency, severity, timing, and management of CRS and ICANS among patients receiving TCE therapy at a community hospital oncology program, and to explore operational impacts, such as length of stay and geographic considerations. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 30 patients who received TCE therapy at the Osler Oncology Program at Brampton Civic Hospital between August 2023 and May 2025 was conducted. Demographic, treatment, adverse event, and operational data were abstracted from electronic medical records using standardized forms. Cytokine release syndrome and ICANS were graded using American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize outcomes. Results: Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 77% (23/30) of patients, predominantly Grade 1 (70% of CRS cases), with most events occurring within 24 hours of ramp-up dosing and primarily following Dose 1. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 27% (8/30) of patients, including one Grade 4 event. Seventy-five percent of ICANS cases occurred in patients who also experienced CRS. Early use of tocilizumab for Grade 1 CRS appeared to reduce progression to higher grades. Mean total length of stay across ramp-up dosing was 11.4 days, decreasing from 7.2 days for the initial visit to 1.6 days for Dose 3. Conclusions: T-cell engager therapy in a community oncology setting is feasible but requires structured nursing assessment protocols, intensive early monitoring, and evolving management strategies. Findings support exploration of risk-stratified outpatient models for selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.