Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42757327›Full record

ArticleDrugs in context2026

Local carboxymethyl β-glucan and polycarbophil in women positive for human papillomavirus: a prospective observational study.

Carmen Pingarrón Santofimia, Ysmael Álvarez Espinosa, Juan José Hernández Aguado, Ana Isabel López Castejón, Maria Soledad Martínez García, Carlos Blanco-Soler, Cristina Del Valle Rubido, Maria Del Pilar Robles Ruiz, Janet Abanto Alvarez, Maria Del Carmen Chicharro Cassuso and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs in context, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Carmen Pingarrón Santofimia *Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4231-4660
Ysmael Álvarez Espinosa *Gynecology Department, Hospital Quirón Donostia, Donostia, Spain.
Juan José Hernández Aguado *Gynecology Department, Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0986-5062
Ana Isabel López Castejón *Gynecology Department, Hospitales HM, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Soledad Martínez García *Gynecology Department, Hospital Sanitas CIMA, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Blanco-Soler *Gynecology Department, Hospiten Roca, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Cristina Del Valle Rubido *Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1091-8897
Maria Del Pilar Robles Ruiz *Gynecology Department, Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Janet Abanto Alvarez *Gynecology Department, Hospital San Rafael, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Del Carmen Chicharro Cassuso *Consulta Privada Dra. Mª Carmen Chicharro Cassuso, Granada, Spain.
Amira Alkourdi Martinez *Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves Materno Infantil, Granada, Spain.
Monica de Vera Gomis *Gynecology Department, Hospital de la Marina Baixa, Alicante, Spain.
Silvia Tamarit Bordes *Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.
Laura Rubert Torro *Departament de Salut de Castelló, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
Caterina Cortés Alaguero *Gynecology Department, Hospital de la Plana, Castellón, Spain.
Irene Vela Sampedro *Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Sant Joan d'Alacant, Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9558-9310
Manuel David Menor Almagro *Clínica Nuestra Señora de la Salud, Cádiz, Spain.
Stefanie Redon Fitzl *Gynaikos, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura Lopez Prada *Gynecology Department, Hospital HM Universitarios Torrelodones, Madrid, Spain.
Montserrat Albarrán Gómez *Gynecology Department, Art Medical, Murcia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infections with normal or low-grade cervical cytology are generally managed through observation because many infections clear spontaneously. However, persistent infection, particularly in women over 35 years of age, may increase the risk of progression and lead to prolonged surveillance, repeated examinations and patient anxiety. This study evaluates the effectiveness of local treatment with carboxymethyl β-glucan and polycarbophil (Colpofix Methods: This prospective, non-randomized controlled, multi-centre study enrolled 533 women aged 25-65 with HR-HPV and normal cytology, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Conducted in real clinical settings, it involved a 3-month treatment or 'wait-and-see' approach, with final follow-up at 6 months. Statistical analysis included various tests such as the Mann-Whitney test, Fisher's exact test and Pearson's χ Results: At 6 months, HR-HPV negativity was observed in 50.1% of treated patients compared with 24.0% in the observation group ( Conclusions: Local treatment with carboxymethyl β-glucan and polycarbophil was associated with higher rates of HR-HPV negativization and ectopy resolution compared with observation alone at 6-month follow-up, supporting its use as a management option, particularly in women over 35 years of age.

Indexed as

atypical squamous cells of undetermined significancecervical intraepithelial neoplasiaclinical settinghuman papillomavirus DNA testslow-grade squamous intraepithelial lesionspapillomavirus infectionspolymersprospective studiestopical administrationβ-glucans

Identifiers

PMID42757327
PMCPMC13585142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.