ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2026
Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Storage Media on the Hardness and Fracture Resistance of Reattached Tooth Fragments: An
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To assess hardness as well as resistance to fracture in the case of a reattached tooth fragment when different storage media are used. Materials and methods: In this study, 60 permanent incisor teeth that were extracted for therapeutic reasons were enrolled and divided into four groups. Each group had 15 specimens ( Results: In group II (HBSS), the mean value of resistance to fracture was maximum, that is, 16.3787 N, which was followed by the coconut water group, that is, group III, with a value of 15.9467 N. Group IV (contact lens solution) had a mean value of 13.1267 N. Resistance to the occurrence of fracture was seen to be very less in the dry environment group, that is, group I, with a mean of 11.7067 N. The maximum hardness was seen with group II (HBSS) at 350.2000 Vickers hardness (HV), followed by group IV (contact lens solution) at 342.5333 HV, and group III (coconut water) with a mean of 342.3333 HV. The least hardness was seen with group I (dry environment) at 295.4667 HV. There was a significant difference in fracture resistance and hardness between these groups. How to cite this article: Dadpe MV, Chordiya NA, Kale YJ,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.