Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42757198›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Diagnostic Reference Levels for Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Critical Appraisal of Global Progress and Remaining Gaps.

Danial Aminaei, Asal Ozlati, Daniela Pita de Melo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Danial AminaeiSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, CAN.
Asal OzlatiCollege of Dentistry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, CAN.
Daniela Pita de MeloCollege of Dentistry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is now firmly established in dental and maxillofacial practice, providing three-dimensional visualization for implant planning, endodontics, orthodontics, and oral surgery. However, the expansion of the use of dental CBCT units worldwide has outpaced efforts to standardize and optimize radiation doses delivered to patients. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are meant to fill this gap, acting as benchmarks that flag facilities where doses may need investigation or optimization. Despite this well-established regulatory concept, uptake of DRLs for dental CBCT varies widely from one country to the next. In this review, we examine where things currently stand globally: the regulatory basis for DRLs, the dose metrics and classification schemes different countries rely on, the DRL values reported in national documents and peer-reviewed literature, and the methodological inconsistencies that make cross-country comparison difficult. Only a small number of countries, mostly in Europe and Japan, have published official national DRLs for dental CBCT. Even among these, there is substantial variation in the dose descriptor used (dose-area product being the most common), in whether classification is based on field of view or clinical indication, and in the resulting DRL values themselves. Perhaps most notably, only one country has established pediatric-specific DRLs for dental CBCT. We also consider the barriers standing in the way of wider adoption: uneven regulatory infrastructure between countries, a lack of standardized dosimetric protocols for CBCT, limited participation in national dose surveys, and the particular difficulty of overseeing CBCT use in private dental practices that fall outside conventional radiology governance. Moving forward, harmonizing dose metrics internationally, expanding multinational surveys, integrating automated dose-tracking tools, and prioritizing pediatric dose optimization will all be important. Building a stronger global framework for dental CBCT DRLs is essential to keeping pace with an imaging modality that continues to grow in clinical utilization.

Indexed as

cone beam computed tomographydental cbctdiagnostic reference levelsdose-area productpatient radiation safetyradiation dose optimization

Identifiers

PMID42757198
PMCPMC13584608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.