ArticleACS omega2026
Registry-Dependent Hydration in Layered Mineral Slit Pores: Insights from Molecular Simulations of Gibbsite and Muscovite.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interfacial water confined between layered mineral surfaces governs particle aggregation, sliding, and oriented attachment, yet the role of lateral surface registry in controlling hydration remains incompletely understood, particularly across different surface chemistries and hydration states. Here we use molecular dynamics simulations to quantify how translational misalignment between opposing basal surfaces modifies hydration energetics, hydrogen-bonding structure, interaction-energy components, and water mobility in gibbsite and muscovite slit pores over water loadings spanning submonolayer to multilayer regimes. For gibbsite, hydration potential energy is most sensitive to lateral registry at the lowest water loading, whereas the hydration potential-energy landscape becomes progressively flatter as additional water layers form. Hydrogen bond populations vary only modestly with mismatch, and the slab-water and water-water interaction energies are generally only weakly sensitive to mismatch, except at the lowest water loading. At this loading, the two interaction-energy contributions vary in opposite directions, such that changes in one are partially offset by changes in the other. At higher water loadings, both contributions become less sensitive to mismatch, resulting in a comparatively smooth hydration potential-energy response. In muscovite, hydration potential energies exhibit a comparatively weak dependence on lateral mismatch even under monolayer confinement, consistent with strong, ion-dominated hydration of surface-bound K that limits reorganization of confined water with mismatch. Mean-squared displacement analysis further indicates that near-registry alignment generally suppresses lateral water mobility relative to mismatched configurations, most clearly at low loadings. Together, these results identify surface registry as a tunable geometric variable that couples to both the thermodynamics and dynamics of nanoconfined water, while demonstrating that the magnitude and mechanism of registry effects are strongly material- and hydration-state-dependent.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.