ArticleEuropean urology open science2026
Ice Water Test Unmasks Detrusor Overactivity in Apparently Normal Conventional Cystometry.
Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of the ice water test (IWT) in unmasking detrusor overactivity (DO) in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) who do not exhibit DO during conventional filling cystometry and to characterize this specific patient population. Design setting and participants: In this observational cohort study, from April 2021 to December 2023, patients with LUTS but no DO in same-session repeat conventional filling cystometry were additionally evaluated using the IWT. All participants underwent standardized urodynamic investigations following International Continence Society guidelines. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was the presence of DO during the IWT. Demographic and clinical factors associated with DO were analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression models. Results and limitations: In 529 UDIs of 451 patients (63 patients had more than one urodynamic investigation (UDI)) without DO in conventional filling cystometry, the IWT revealed DO in 51% (229/451). Detection was more frequent in patients with an underlying neurological disorder (53% vs 34%, Conclusions: In patients with LUTS but no DO on conventional filling cystometry, the IWT might reveal DO in approximately half of the cases. This underscores the diagnostic value of the IWT in both patients with neurological and nonneurological conditions and leads to a better understanding of LUTS-causing pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.