ArticleDigital biomarkers
Consensus-Based Definitions for Vocal Biomarkers: The International VOCAL Initiative.
Article in Digital biomarkers. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speech and Language Changes During Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep with Potential Diagnostic Markers: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- An End-to-End Overview of Clinical Speech AI.IEEE transactions on audio, speech, and language processing (2025) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Voice-based health technologies are growing rapidly, but they lack standardized terminology, which hinders interdisciplinary collaboration, research quality, and clinical translation. The objective of this work was to develop universally accepted definitions in the rapidly evolving field of vocal biomarkers, as part of the VOCAL (Vocal Biomarker Guidelines for Ontology, Classification, Application, and Logistics) initiative, a structured, international consensus-based framework that aims to provide standards and guidelines. Methods: VOCAL is a rigorous, international, multistage consensus-building study conducted in 2024-2025. It is a multi-institutional collaboration between representatives from the Bridge2AI-Voice Consortium (North America) and the eVoiceNet Network (European Union), involving a group of 24 international experts in medicine, clinical research, speech and language, audio signal processing, statistics, methodology, regulation, and ethics. VOCAL's iterative process involved 5 rounds of review and feedback and an in-person workshop at the 2025 Bridge2AI Voice Symposium. Results: Consensus-based definitions for vocal biomarkers were developed, spanning from broad concepts to domain-specific measures. A hierarchical continuum model of vocal biomarkers was established. We first distinguished between the concepts of vocal measures and vocal biomarkers. We then defined terms from broad, overarching concepts (level 0: biomarker, digital biomarker, vocal biomarker) to more specific physiological and cognitive domains (level 1: cardio-respiratory acoustic; level 2: voice; level 3: speech/articulatory; level 4: cognitive/language, including linguistic and paralinguistic subtypes). Conclusion: This work provides a shared vocabulary that is essential for fostering communication through interdisciplinary collaboration, improving the quality and efficiency of research and development, and ensuring the ethical, reliable, and scalable deployment of future voice-based health technologies. It lays foundational groundwork for upcoming guidelines and standards, which are crucial for advancing the field of vocal biomarkers into widespread clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.