Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42757074›Full record

ArticleNAM journal2026

Test substance preparation determines the tested fraction and the outcome of human health NAMs for poorly-water-soluble (pre)polymers.

Susanne N Kolle, Philipp Demuth, Nina Hambruch, Naveed Honarvar, Friederike Lünne, Nora Melchin, Dorothee Funk-Weyer, David Schaffert, Robert Landsiedel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAM journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Susanne N KolleBASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Philipp DemuthBASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Nina HambruchBASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Naveed HonarvarBASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Friederike LünneBASF SE, Analytical and Material Science, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Nora MelchinBASF SE, Analytical and Material Science, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Dorothee Funk-WeyerBASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
David SchaffertBASF SE, Analytical and Material Science, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Robert LandsiedelBASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While a comprehensive revision of the REACh regulation is currently no longer under consideration, regulatory requirements potentially covering analytical, ecotoxicological, and toxicological aspects of polymers may still evolve. Regulatory testing typically relies on OECD test guidelines (TGs), which are generally designed for small molecules. According to REACh and following the 3R principles, non-animal methods, also described as new approach methods (NAMs) are the first choice for testing. The applicability of NAMs for polymers, substances with high molecular weights and varying solubility, is limited and test substance application in aqueous media presents a challenge. Standards described for the biological evaluation of medical devices (DIN EN ISO 10993) and food contact materials (DIN EN 13130) offer test substance preparation methods for finished articles including polymer materials. In this study, preparations of seven non-water soluble (pre)polymer materials were selected for testing with four different NAMs: basal cytotoxicity assay, an estrogen receptor transcriptional activation assay (OECD TG 455), in vitro micronucleus test (OECD TG 487) and in vitro skin irritation test (OECD TG 439/ DIN EN ISO 10993). Although the test substance preparation steps developed for finished medical device or food contact products technically allowed testing of all seven (pre)polymers across the four NAMs, this approach is fundamentally limited. Applying standard methods designed for small molecules (e.g., OECD TGs) or finished articles (e.g., ISO standards) to (pre)polymers does not necessarily produce data that realistically reflect bioavailable fractions under intended use conditions. Development of standardized methods for analytical, ecotoxicological and toxicological evaluations is essential for complex test materials such as polymers.

Indexed as

Human health endpointsPolymerTechnical applicabilityTest substance preparation

Identifiers

PMID42757074
PMCPMC13584117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.