ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Mechanisms of acquired resistance to osimertinib in EGFR T790M-Positive lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib serves as the gold standard therapy for treating NSCLC patients harboring EGFR T790M mutations. The clinical utility of this agent, however, faces considerable constraints due to the unavoidable emergence of acquired resistance mechanisms. Understanding the molecular basis of osimertinib resistance holds paramount importance for determining optimal follow-up treatment approaches. Methods: Clinical information from 86 lung adenocarcinoma patients carrying EGFR T790M mutations who showed disease advancement following osimertinib therapy was examined retrospectively, spanning the period from January 2018 through December 2023. Genomic characterization was conducted via next-generation sequencing on tissue or liquid biopsy specimens collected after resistance developed. Protein expression alterations were assessed through immunohistochemical staining, while critical resistance pathways underwent validation using cell line models. Results: Among the 86-patient cohort, the median duration before disease progression reached 14.2 months. Genomic characterization identified these predominant resistance pathways: C797S mutations in EGFR (23.3%), amplification of MET (15.1%), amplification of HER2 (8.1%), mutations in PIK3CA (7.0%), transformation to small cell lung cancer (9.3%), and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (12.8%). Concurrent presence of multiple resistance mechanisms was detected in 24.4% of the patient population. Within the C797S mutation subset, 65.0% exhibited C797S/T790M in cis arrangement, 30.0% demonstrated trans arrangement, and 5.0% showed mixed configurations. Laboratory validation established that MET amplification confers resistance via bypass activation of both ERK and AKT signaling cascades. The poorest clinical outcomes were observed among patients undergoing histological transformation (median overall survival from confirmed progression: 8.3 months). Conclusion: Remarkable heterogeneity characterizes the resistance mechanisms emerging against osimertinib in EGFR T790M-positive lung adenocarcinoma, with EGFR secondary mutations, bypass signaling pathway activation, and histological transformation representing the primary categories. Detection of specific resistance mechanisms enables tailored subsequent therapeutic approaches, with potential outcome improvements achievable through combination strategies incorporating targeted agents or immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.