Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42757002›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

An LLM-enhanced AI agent for rapid diagnosis of acute aortic dissection in multi-center settings.

Hunian Li, Yuchen Pei, Tao Hu, Xiaoyu Hu, Jiazhen Luo, Manli Zhu, Jie Li, Yutao Ma, Li Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hunian LiDepartment of Emergency, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yuchen PeiSchool of Computer Science, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.
Tao HuDepartment of Emergency, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoyu HuSchool of Computer Science, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.
Jiazhen LuoDepartment of Emergency, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Manli ZhuDepartment of Emergency, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Emergency, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yutao MaSchool of Computer Science, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.
Li YanDepartment of Emergency, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a high-mortality cardiovascular emergency, yet early diagnosis before computed tomography angiography (CTA) remains challenging. We developed AAD-Agent as a pre-imaging triage aid-not as a replacement for CTA-and evaluated it in a retrospective, multi-center study. Using 869 suspected patients from 3 Chinese hospitals for internal validation and 200 from 2 additional hospitals for external validation, we compared AAD-Agent against a machine learning (ML) ensemble model. The ML-ensemble model performed well internally (accuracy 0.948, F1-score 0.964) but deteriorated externally (0.540, 0.600). In contrast, AAD-Agent maintained external stability across LLMs: DeepSeek-R1 (accuracy 0.715, F1-score 0.820), GPT-3.5 (0.715, 0.825), and GPT-4o (0.710, 0.803). Although the case-enriched design inflates these metrics, prevalence-adjusted negative predictive value (≈99.6% at 1% prevalence) supports AAD-Agent as a safe, low-cost rule-out aid to defer CTA in low-risk patients. Its low external specificity precludes confirmatory diagnosis, limiting use to rule out pending prospective validation.

Indexed as

acute aortic dissectionAI agentlarge language modelpre-imaging triage/risk stratificationworkflow

Identifiers

PMID42757002
PMCPMC13583947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.