Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756996›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Metaheuristic-driven automatic ARIMA order selection using spider monkey optimization for agricultural production forecasting.

Anil Kumar, Roshini Priya C H, Fasila K P, Santosha Rathod, S Vishnu Shankar, Mrinmoy Ray, Sujith Arokia Swamy B, Santosh Patil, Chiranjit Mazumder, Sudhir Kumar Mishra and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anil KumarTechnical Coordination Unit, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, , New Delhi, 110001, India.
Roshini Priya C HProfessor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, Hyderabad, 500030, India.
Fasila K PICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Santosha RathodICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, Pune, 413115, India.
S Vishnu ShankarTamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
Mrinmoy RayICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Sujith Arokia Swamy BICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Santosh PatilICAR- Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Chiranjit MazumderICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Sudhir Kumar MishraICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, Pune, 413115, India.
V LavanyaICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641003, India.
Ashutosh Kumar MisraAgricultural Meteorology Division, India Meteorological Department, Shivajinagar, Pune, 411005, India.
Vipin Kumar ChoudharyICAR- Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, Meerut, 250110, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model requires appropriate selection of autoregressive (p), differencing (d), and moving average (q) orders for accurate forecasting. Conventional order selection methods, such as grid search and stepwise information-criterion approaches, can be computationally expensive and prone to suboptimal solutions. This study proposes ARIMA-Spider Monkey Optimization (ARIMA-SMO), an automated framework that employs Spider Monkey Optimization to identify optimal ARIMA orders. In the proposed approach, each spider monkey represents a candidate ARIMA (p,d,q) configuration, and model fitness is evaluated using a combination of statistical goodness-of-fit and forecasting accuracy. The local and global leader mechanisms, together with adaptive subgroup restructuring, balance exploration and exploitation of the search space. The method was evaluated using agricultural production time series from India and compared with Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Bayesian Optimization (BO)-based ARIMA models. Across all six-production series, ARIMA-SMO consistently achieved the lowest forecasting errors while requiring less computational time than the competing approaches. For the total food grains series, ARIMA-SMO reduced the test RMSE to 35.75 compared with 43.96 (GA), 39.84 (PSO), and 37.12 (BO). The results demonstrate that ARIMA-SMO is an effective and computationally efficient framework for automatic ARIMA order selection and time-series forecasting.

Indexed as

Order selection, Time series forecastingSpider Monkey Optimization (SMO)Swarm intelligence

Identifiers

PMID42756996
PMCPMC13584011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.