Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756953›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2026

Artificial intelligence-driven risk prediction of polypharmacy in older adults: current advances, clinical applications, and future perspectives.

Jianfeng Chen, Leyu Tao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jianfeng ChenDepartment of Emergency, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Leyu TaoThe First Hospital of Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the ageing of the population, multimorbidity and polypharmacy has significantly increased, causing medication safety to become a global health concern. Traditionally, medication risk assessment methods based on the counts of medications or rule-based criteria are inadequate to perceive the dynamic, individual and longitudinal nature of medication-related risks in older people. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in retrospective predictive modelling for precision medication and medication risk stratification, although prospective evidence demonstrating clinical effectiveness remains scarce. This narrative review presents the current evidence on AI-based polypharmacy risk prediction approaches in older people with a focus on machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, graph neural network, large language models, and longitudinal trajectory modelling. We highlight some of the major data sources, predictive algorithms, clinical decision support systems and real-world applications, stressing mostly on patient-centred medication management, nurse-led interventions, transitional care and continuity of care. Furthermore, the review highlights significant challenges specifically related to model interpretability, data quality, external validation, ethical governance, privacy protection and clinical implementation which currently limits the translation of AI into routine practice. Future research needs to focus on longitudinal dynamic risk prediction and multimodal data integration. The validation of Esplanade AI by multiple centers as well as collaboration among various fields, will support better medication safety and health outcomes for Older Adults. Harmonization of contemporary AI technologies with geriatric drug use through a public health lens will provide possible guideposts for precision prevention, healthy ageing and sustainable health care delivery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePolypharmacyAgedHumansPrediction AlgorithmsRisk Assessmentartificial intelligencemedication safetyolder adultspolypharmacyrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID42756953
PMCPMC13584958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.