ArticleBMJ public health2026
Occupational health challenges among university security personnel in a low-resource setting: a qualitative exploratory study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: University security personnel in low-resource settings are among the most occupationally vulnerable non-academic staff yet they remain largely absent from occupational health research. This study investigated how university security officers in Ghana perceive and navigate occupational health challenges associated with burnout and shift-related stress. Methods: A qualitative exploratory study rooted in interpretive phenomenology was conducted between July and August 2025 at a public university in southern Ghana. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 purposively selected security personnel with at least 5 years of service. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis approach. Results: Five themes emerged: (I) occupational workload and burnout driven by chronic understaffing; (II) perceptual burden and emotional strain from disrespectful student interactions; (III) night duty as a significant stressor through disrupted sleep and environmental hazards; (IV) improvised individual and social coping strategies; and (V) inadequate institutional support and structural resource gaps as predictors of sustained stress and burnout. Conclusion: Burnout and occupational stress among university security personnel in low-resource settings reflect institutional and systemic failures rather than individual shortcomings. Sustainable improvements require adequate staffing, psychosocial support, gender-responsive scheduling and improved infrastructure. Future research should employ longitudinal and multisite designs to capture temporal and contextual variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.