Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756931›Full record

ArticleReading and writing2025

Orthographic Influences on Phonological Processing in Children with and without Reading Difficulties: An Eyetracking Study.

Lauren S Baron, Anna M Ehrhorn, Peter Shlanta, Jane Ashby, Bethany A Bell, Suzanne M Adlof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reading and writing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren S BaronDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States.
Anna M EhrhornDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States.
Peter ShlantaDepartment of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, United States.
Jane AshbyDepartment of Reading Science, Mount St. Joseph University, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Bethany A BellDepartment of Education Leadership, Foundations and Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.
Suzanne M AdlofDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States.

Funding

Word Learning in Reading and Language Impairment SubgroupsR01DC017156 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI ADLOF, SUZANNE M. · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phonological processing is an important contributor to decoding and spelling difficulties, but it does not fully explain word reading outcomes for all children. As orthographic knowledge is acquired, it influences phonological processing in typical readers. In the present study, we examined whether orthography affects phonological processing differently for children with current reading difficulties (RD), children with a history of reading difficulties who are currently presenting with typical word reading skills (Hx), and children with typical development and no history of reading difficulties (TD). School-aged children completed a phonological awareness task containing spoken words and pictures while eye movements were recorded. In this task, children had to pair a spoken stimulus word with one of four pictures that ended with the same sound. Within the task, stimulus-target picture pairs varied in the orthographic congruency and consistency of the orthographic and phonological mappings of their final consonant sounds. Eye movements revealed that children with typical word reading (the Hx and TD groups) showed better discrimination of the target from the foils compared to peers with underdeveloped word reading skills. All children were more accurate when stimulus-target pairs were congruent and consistent than when they were incongruent or inconsistent. Orthography plays an important role in the completion of phonological awareness tasks, even in the absence of written words and for children with a wide range of reading abilities. Results highlight the importance of considering orthography during interventions for phonological awareness and word reading.

Indexed as

eye trackingorthographic knowledgephonological processingreading difficultyword reading

Identifiers

PMID42756931
PMCPMC13585030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.