ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2026
Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST).
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: High-risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) require an individualized approach and may not be eligible for cholecystectomy. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the management of ACC in patients with either high operative risk or delayed presentation. Methods: An evidence-based systematic review was performed to answer the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes (PICO) questions. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024610156). An academic health science librarian and lead authors developed the search strategy. The search was conducted in Medline (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane CENTRAL (Ovid), and Web of Science. The search strategy was written for Medline and translated using each database's syntax, subject headings, and search fields. An initial search, conducted on August 3, 2020, was updated on June 5, 2025. Results: A total of 25 studies were identified. We conditionally recommend that high-risk patients with ACC undergo treatment with antibiotics alone versus using percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) and antibiotics. No recommendation was made to treat patients with ACC with more than 5 days of symptoms with either cholecystectomy or antibiotics. No recommendation was made to treat patients with ACC with more than 5 days of symptoms with PC or antibiotics. We conditionally recommend removing the PC catheter without performing cholecystectomy after resolution of ACC in high-risk patients who have evidence of cystic duct patency. Conclusion: Risks of cholecystectomy and PC must be balanced in patients who are high-risk for operative management. Level of evidence: Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.