Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756873›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2026

Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST).

Asanthi Ratnasekera, Rishi Rattan, Bishwajit Bhattacharya, Zugui Zhang, Madison Harris, Sirivan S Seng, Connor Magura, Christopher A Butts, Judy Rabinowitz, Jordan Michael Kirsch and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Asanthi RatnasekeraSurgery, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, Delaware, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4618-088X
Rishi RattanLegacy Emanuel Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1403-1249
Bishwajit BhattacharyaSurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7118-7621
Zugui ZhangStatistics, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Madison HarrisSurgery, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, Delaware, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7166-616X
Sirivan S SengUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Connor MaguraSurgery, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Christopher A ButtsTower Health, West Reading, Pennsylvania, USA.
Judy RabinowitzHealth Sciences Library, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jordan Michael KirschWestchester Medical Center Health Network, Valhalla, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-1180
Ida MolaviAdvocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7091-845X
Haytham KaafaraniSurgery, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Tejal S BrahmbhattSurgery, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Michael W CrippsSurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1263-1876
Nikolay BugaevSurgery, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
John J ComoSurgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-8357

Funding

Subproject Title: Clinical Research Education, Mentoring and Career Development CoreU54GM104941 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI Gregory E Hicks · 2013 to 2026
$60.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High-risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) require an individualized approach and may not be eligible for cholecystectomy. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the management of ACC in patients with either high operative risk or delayed presentation. Methods: An evidence-based systematic review was performed to answer the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes (PICO) questions. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024610156). An academic health science librarian and lead authors developed the search strategy. The search was conducted in Medline (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane CENTRAL (Ovid), and Web of Science. The search strategy was written for Medline and translated using each database's syntax, subject headings, and search fields. An initial search, conducted on August 3, 2020, was updated on June 5, 2025. Results: A total of 25 studies were identified. We conditionally recommend that high-risk patients with ACC undergo treatment with antibiotics alone versus using percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) and antibiotics. No recommendation was made to treat patients with ACC with more than 5 days of symptoms with either cholecystectomy or antibiotics. No recommendation was made to treat patients with ACC with more than 5 days of symptoms with PC or antibiotics. We conditionally recommend removing the PC catheter without performing cholecystectomy after resolution of ACC in high-risk patients who have evidence of cystic duct patency. Conclusion: Risks of cholecystectomy and PC must be balanced in patients who are high-risk for operative management. Level of evidence: Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Indexed as

cholecystectomycholecystitis

Identifiers

PMID42756873
PMCPMC13583704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.