Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756815›Full record

ArticleChina CDC weekly2026

Improving Risk Communication and Community Engagement for Public Health Emergencies in China: A State-guided Cooperative Trust Model.

Yi Cai, Jie Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in China CDC weekly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yi CaiWuhan University Institute of International Law, Wuhan University, Wuchan City, Hubei Province, China.
Jie ZhuWuhan University School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuchan City, Hubei Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) constitutes a mandatory core capacity under the International Health Regulations (IHR 2005). However, dominant RCCE frameworks are rooted in Western institutional contexts and lack theoretical adaptation to China's state-led governance system. Drawing on an integrated multi-theoretical RCCE framework, this paper systematically examines the context-specific features and the limitations of China's present RCCE model in public health emergencies (PHEs). It identifies critical institutional, adaptive, and trust-related gaps by implementing literature review, policy analysis and case studies in China's RCCE practice, and proposes a state-guided cooperative trust model to reconstruct China's RCCE system. This study addresses the theoretical misalignment between global RCCE frameworks and China's institutional context, providing actionable implications for PHE preparedness and global health security.

Indexed as

ChinaPublic health emergencyRisk communication and community engagementTheoretical framework

Identifiers

PMID42756815
PMCPMC13583518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.