ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
CD19 expression is preserved following CD19-directed monoclonal antibody therapy with tafasitamab.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenges of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation and CD19 Testing Following Tafasitamab Plus Lenalidomide for Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Journal of medical cases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The potential risk of eliminating or reducing CD19 expression following CD19-targeted therapies has raised questions about the optimal treatment sequencing strategies for B-cell malignancies. This study assessed CD19 expression and mutational status in samples from patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies who received tafasitamab, an anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody. Methods: Biopsy and peripheral blood samples were collected from a total of 100 patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies who received tafasitamab in a clinical trial or a real-world setting. Post-treatment samples collected from 66 patients were available for assessment of CD19 protein expression; six samples were excluded from the analyses as CD19 expression could not be assessed due to lack of residual lymphoma cells. The remaining 60 samples were assessed by either immunohistochemistry (n=46) or flow cytometry (n=14). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to assess CD19 mutational status (n=39) and transcript expression (n=4). CD19 retention in lymphoma cell lines treated with tafasitamab was assessed by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Results: Of 46 patient samples assessed by immunohistochemistry, 45 (98%) were CD19 positive after tafasitamab treatment. CD19 expression was retained in all 14 samples analyzed by flow cytometry. NGS of 39 samples revealed no somatic Conclusion: These data suggest that tafasitamab treatment, even in the most recent line, may not preclude subsequent treatment with other CD19-targeting agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.