SynthesisFrontiers in sports and active living2026
A worldwide synthesis of handball research: regional identities, performance themes, and emerging scientific directions.
Synthesis in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between regional scientific investment and international competitive achievement in handball has never been systematically examined. This scoping review addresses that gap by providing the first globally contextualised synthesis of contemporary handball research, drawing on 205 DOI-indexed, peer-reviewed, English-language studies published between 2020 and 2026 and identified through a PRISMA 2020-compliant search of four major databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, SPORTDiscus). Evidence was mapped across nine international research regions and six performance-science themes, and a novel Competitive Performance Index (CPI) was constructed from official IHF and EHF records to enable structured comparison between scientific output and senior men's competitive achievement across the same period. Regional analysis reveals four distinct science-performance relationship patterns. Scandinavia (CPI = 40; 16 studies) demonstrates convergence: sustained scientific leadership in injury epidemiology, neuromuscular risk profiling, and load monitoring co-evolves with four consecutive World Championship titles and Olympic gold. The Iberian Peninsula (CPI = 11; 39 studies, the highest volume of any region) and Central-Eastern Europe (CPI = 0; 30 studies) exhibit a leading-indicator pattern, in which scientific investment appears to precede competitive breakthrough by a temporal lag. The German-speaking region (CPI = 7; 28 studies) illustrates how frontier AI-driven performance analytics and youth championship success may function as competitive force multipliers. Western Europe (CPI = 15; 11 studies) demonstrates that strategically concentrated science sustains elite performance without high publication volume. Six thematic pillars structure the evidence base: biomechanics, injury risk and prevention, tactical and match performance, training physiology and conditioning, youth development and maturation, and technology-enhanced analytics. These domains are increasingly interdependent, reflecting a sport entering a phase of genuine scientific maturity. Critical structural gaps persist: approximately 74% of studies are male-only, North America and Oceania are almost entirely absent from the corpus, and the Technology-Enhanced Analytics category (5% of studies) substantially underestimates the true volume of technology-infused research due to the hierarchical classification rule applied. The CPI framework introduced here provides a replicable tool for examining science-performance alignment in handball and, with adaptation, in other team sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.