ArticleCJC open2026
PaO
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary congestion leading to dyspnea is the main cause of hospitalization in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Intravenous tolvaptan (TLV) is an option for acute decongestion, but its effects on pulmonary congestion remain unclear, due to limited objective tools. The arterial oxygen partial pressure to inspired oxygen fraction (PaO Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adults hospitalized for ADHF between January 2022 and December 2023. Patients receiving TLV plus furosemide (TLV+F) were compared with those receiving furosemide (F alone). The primary endpoint was the 24-hour P/F ratio; secondary endpoints were urine output and safety (serum sodium, potassium, creatinine, and hemodynamics). Logistic regression identified factors associated with improved oxygenation. Subgroup analyses were by left ventricular ejection fraction (< 40% vs ≥ 40%). Results: Among 120 patients (TLV+F n = 48; F alone n = 72), the TLV+F group achieved a higher 24-hour P/F ratio (340 ± 89 vs 281 ± 87; Conclusions: In ADHF, use of adjunctive intravenous TLV was associated with improved early oxygenation and diuresis without an apparent increase in short-term adverse events. These exploratory findings suggest that intravenous TLV may be a useful component of acute decongestive therapy, warranting prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.