ReviewMediterranean journal of rheumatology2026
Vaccines for Autoimmune Diseases: Stopping Triggers, Restoring BalanceA Systematic Review with Qualitative Synthesis.
Review in Mediterranean journal of rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To critically review the scientific background on vaccines designed to prevent autoimmune diseases, including two main strategies: (1) vaccines directed against pathogens involved in triggering disease, including Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), enterovirus and Streptococcus pyogenes; and (2) tolerogenic vaccine approaches targeting the immune response to restore tolerance to self-antigens. Methods: We performed a thorough systematic review of clinical trials, observational studies, meta-analysis and pre-clinical data. A broad search was implemented in biomedical databases and gray literature. This systematic review was conducted with qualitative synthesis, given the heterogeneity of study designs, diseases, and outcomes. Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data, using standard risk of bias and quality of evidence assessment tools. Results: There were 68 studies, 36 in humans and 32 preclinical studies included. In the anti-infective area, options include gp350 vaccine for EBV (phase 2), mRNA based early-stage vaccines, a population-based study of the impact of rotavirus vaccination on type 1 diabetes incidence, and inactivated PRV-101 Coxsackie B strain vaccine; for rheumatic fever, phase 1 trials are providing evidence with vaccines such as StreptAnova and J8/S2. With regard to the tolerogenic line, tolerogenic DC-based and of myelin peptides vaccines have shown immune regulation in illnesses such as MS and RA, but do not yet demonstrate solid clinical evidence. Conclusions: Trigger infections vaccines are now nearing clinical use whereas tolerogenic vaccines constitute an attractive approach for the future. The combination of these approaches has the potential to inform future preventive and therapeutic strategies, but current evidence remains heterogeneous and largely early-stage, particularly for tolerogenic platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.